Rochester – Page 2 – Rochester Bankruptcy and Debt Relief

Upcoming Changes to the Means Test Figures

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of November 1, 2011. In New York, it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to decrease.

Through October 31, 2011, a single debtor in New York could have $46,295 in income in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting November 1, 2011, that figure is decreasing to $45,931. Similar decreases will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,295 $57,777 $68,396 $83,942

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,931 $56,113 $66,953 $81,212

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the decreases are not large, they are going to make it more difficult for some individuals and families to qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

The figures used for the each state’s median income are based on United States Census data, and adopted by the Office of the United States Trustee. Usually, these figures are adjusted based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers once or twice per year.

When the economy is growing, typically income rises because of the cost of living increases, inflation and other reasons. When the economy is not growing, income actually decreased from the prior year. As a result, the means test is adjusted and lower median income figures are used which make it more difficult for debtors to qualify for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, New York, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Cell Phones and Bankruptcy

Filing bankruptcy can release a debtor from an expensive cell phone contract and let debtor discharge the early termination penalty. While now almost everyone has a cell phone, the contracts are typically long term and it is easy for a debtor to run up a substantial bill. Should a typical consumer debtor filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy list their cell phone provider as a creditor for bankruptcy purposes?

If debtor has an outstanding bill on a closed account, then such bill must be included with the rest of the outstanding debts. Any such bill will be eliminated by the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy filing, or paid in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

In addition, the bankruptcy filing would enable the debtor to not only eliminate their balance but remove their obligation to pay any early cancellation penalty. Filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy has the effect of terminating any “executory contract” which is one in which the parties are still performing it. Cell phone contracts are executory contracts during the contract period. By including the cell phone provider as a creditor in the bankruptcy petition, the contract is automatically terminated, and any early cancellation penalty becomes a dischargeable debt just like the credit card debts. Some cell phone companies may request a security deposit after the bankruptcy filing, but, in my experience, most providers will not ask for a security deposit.

If debtor plans to keep the account, the account must be listed in the bankruptcy petition. Debtors should list the cell phone provider as a potential creditor in the bankruptcy petition, even if no balance is owed. Although the bankruptcy law has the effect of automatically terminating the cell phone contract, virtually all cell phone companies will continue service if the account is current, and will not pay any attention to the bankruptcy filing. The advantage to the debtor is that by including the cell phone company in the petition, even if it is current, is that the contract can later be terminated before the end of the typical two-year period, and the debtor will not be responsible for the early termination penalty.

In addition to the above, debtors should always include their cell phones in Schedule B which lists all of their personal property. Here in Rochester, Chapter 7 trustees have been raising this issue during 341 meetings and asking debtors about the cell phones they owns. Since some of the phones, such as an iPhone, are valuable, trustees can look at them as one more potential asset in the bankruptcy estate.

If you contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Bankruptcy, Credit Unions and Cross-Collateralization of Loans

One issue that periodically comes up in bankruptcy cases is cross-collateralization of assets by credit unions. What does that mean? Cross-collateralization is basically the use of collateral from one loan to secure other loans.

Most credit unions, including local credit unions here in Rochester, New York, use “Loanliner” documents. These form agreements are used by financial institutions for their lending transactions. Included in standard Loanliner lending agreements is a provision in which the borrower agrees that all other loans with the lender are cross-collateralized. The cross-collateralization clause from a recent Loanliner agreement reads: “the security interest also secures any other loans, including any credit card loan, you have now or receive in the future from us and any other amounts you owe us for any reason now or in the future.”

Credit unions often use this clause in vehicle loan agreements to secure all other credit union debts with the vehicle. This may surprise someone when they discover that the debt on the car may include a personal loan, a line of credit, and credit card balances.

There are a few options in bankruptcy if the debtor has a cross-collateralized auto loan. If a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case is filed, the debtor can request that the credit union prepare a reaffirmation agreement for the vehicle without regard to other debts. In this situation, the debtor is asking the credit union to voluntarily strip off the cross-collateralized loans. If the credit union rejects such request, the debtor has two options: (1) surrender the vehicle and discharge all debts to the credit union; or (2) redeem the vehicle.

If the debtor surrenders the car, the credit union takes the car back and sells it, usually at auction. Any deficiency left on the car loan and all additional cross-collateralized debts owed to the credit union are discharged in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. If the debtor in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy chooses to redeem the car, the debtor gets to keep a vehicle by paying the value of the vehicle, not the total debt that is owed. While somewhat similar to a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cram-down, redemption requires that the payment to the secured creditor must be made in a lump sum and does not allow for payments over time.

If the debtor is filing a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, the loan can be crammed-down to match the vehicle’s value provided that the loan is over 910 days old. Any remaining debt is treated as unsecured debt and is discharged at the end of the Chapter 13 case. Another option is to surrender the vehicle just as in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

Importance of Providing Accurate Information in Your Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules

I have previously written how important it is for debtors to provide their bankruptcy attorney with accurate and complete information. Debtors have an absolute obligation under the Bankruptcy Code to disclose their assets, liabilities and income to the bankruptcy court. Once in a while, a debtor may forget a creditor or overlook an old debt. Not every debt appears on the credit report either. When a debt is omitted from the bankruptcy petition, under the Bankruptcy Code, there are several possible solutions.

Initially, if the debtor realizes that a debt was overlooked during the bankruptcy, the debtor is required to file amended schedules and identify the creditor. If this happens, the bankruptcy attorney should be notified and he will amend the schedules.

If a pre-bankruptcy debt is discovered after the bankruptcy case has been closed and discharge granted, there are a couple of possible options. In some situations, it will be necessary to request that the bankruptcy court reopens the bankruptcy case and discharge the debt. In other situations, especially in no asset Chapter 7 Bankruptcy cases, the debt is considered discharged as a matter of law, even though it wasn’t listed in the schedules. Finally, some types of debt, such as student loans, cannot be discharged under most circumstances, and will survive the bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy courts expect the debtor to provide a full and complete disclosure of both assets and liabilities. In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy asset cases and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases, an omission matters a great deal since listed creditors receive payments through the bankruptcy court. If a debtor deliberately fails to list a creditor, that debt is likely be declared non-dischargeable and will survived the bankruptcy. Under appropriate circumstances, courts have denied debtor a bankruptcy discharge because of the debtor’s intentional failure to list all debts or revoked already issued discharge.

Utility Services After Bankruptcy

There are times when debtors need to discharge debts owed to their local utilities. However, often the debtor has to come back to the same utility after discharging the debt owed to it in either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. The utility has to provide services to the debtor, provided that the debtor complies with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The following will describe applicable law and practices common in Rochester, New York, area.

In general, the Bankruptcy Code requires utilities to continue to provide service after a bankruptcy filing, since debtors need electricity and heat as much as anyone else. The Bankruptcy Code authorizes utilities to charge a security deposit in exchange for providing their services.

In Rochester, Rochester Gas & Electric (RG& E) is the largest utility company. When RG&E receives a notice that they have been listed as a creditor on a bankruptcy, RG&E will close the existing account and open a new account (with a new account number) for the debtor. RG&E will calculate what is owed on the account as of the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. If RG&E is listed as a creditor in a bankruptcy case, they will request that a debtor provide them with a security deposit. They calculate the amount of the deposit at two months of average utility bills, with the deposit being due within 30 days of after RG&E sends out the security deposit request. The deadline for the deposit cannot be changed. After the debtor has made timely payments for a year, his deposit will be returned.

The above guidelines were discussed in a decision by the Bankruptcy Court Judge, John C. Ninfo II, which addressed these issues in In re Spencer. Judge Ninfo decided that:

1) Absent extraordinary circumstances, public utilities, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 366(b) may require a Ch. 7, 11 or 13 residential customer to pay a security deposit equal to the highest two months, without late charges, of the previous twelve months.
2) While a case is still open, if a post-petition utility payment is more than 10 days late, the utility may apply to the court (on two business days notice to debtor and attorney) for an order authorizing termination of service should the debtor fail to pay any two consecutive monthly statements by the due date. The attorney for the debtor can set up a telephone conference and oppose the application if circumstances warrant it.
3) Should a residential customer who has made a two month security deposit be late in paying any statement, the utility may commence “whatever procedures are available to it under applicable state law and regulations to terminate service, so that it will be in a position to terminate service at the earliest permissible time before or after the debtor’s case is closed.

My concern as attorney representing debtors is that it may be difficult for my clients to come up with a substantial deposit. At the same time, I recognize that my clients have to pay for the service they receive, and that they already benefited from discharging their prior utility bills in bankruptcy.

Hardship Discharge in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

When a debtor files for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in New York, the typical end result is either a 3 or 5 year plan requiring the debtor to pay his disposable income to the bankruptcy trustee, who in turn will pay to the debtor’s creditors. Occasionally, a debtor may suffer further financial reverses or health problems, so that the repayment plan is no longer affordable, and there is not possibility of modifying the plan. While one of the options is converting the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy into Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, it may not always be possible because of the means test issues.

If debtor can’t keep up with Chapter 13 plan payments, U.S. Bankruptcy Code includes a provision called a Hardship Discharge that provides relief for debtors who can’t continue with a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The hardship discharge is contained for in 11 U.S.C. 1328(b). The debtor who cannot complete the repayment plan, can ask the court for a hardship discharge. In most cases, the discharge is only available when the following conditions are met:

Through no fault of his own, debtor has experienced circumstances that are beyond his control that makes it impossible for him to continue to make plan payments.
The payments made so far in the Chapter 13 Plan are at least as much as each creditor would have received in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation case, i.e., the “best interest” test is satisfied.
The repayment plan can’t be modified to allow debtor to continue making payments at a lower amount.

When it is expected that the period of hardship is short, the bankruptcy courts prefer that debtor moves to modify his Chapter 13 Plan to pay a lower amount than was originally agreed upon until circumstances change for the better. Given the present economic difficulties, bankruptcy courts, here in Rochester and elsewhere in New York, are willing to consider a hardship discharge as a way to move the case forward rather than risking dismissal or conversion to Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

If debtor cannot continue to work as a result of an illness or injury, it is likely that his income was reduced significantly or he may not be able to work at all. In some cases, debtor might not have any money left over once his basic living expenses are met. In this case, a hardship discharge may be the answer. It will eliminate any debts that are dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Upcoming Changes to the Means Test

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of March 15, 2011. In New York, it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to increase.

Through March14, 2011, a single debtor in New York could have $45,548 in income in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting March 15, 2011, that figure is increasing to $46,295. Similar increases will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,548 $56,845 $67,292 $82,587

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,295 $57,777 $68,396 $83,942

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the increases are not large, they are an improvement on the last set of income limits. The reason for a slight growth in the median income is the decline in the American economy. Since the economy is down, employers do not give employees significant wages increases. As a result, the American median family income has grown only slightly, and means test figures increased only moderately.

Tax Refunds and Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

It is that time of the year again. Starting in the beginning of the year and until April 15, debtors are filing their federal and New York State income tax returns. For those debtors who are thinking about filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, it is usually a good idea to receive and use their income tax refunds prior to filing for bankruptcy. For those debtors who filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy during the past year, it maybe the time to provide copies of their income tax returns to the bankruptcy trustee.

Debtors who filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy usually learn during their meeting of the creditors whether the bankruptcy trustee will want to see their income tax returns for the past year. The reason that the bankruptcy trustee will want to see the income returns because it will allow him to figure out what portion of the income tax refunds, if any, is the property of the bankruptcy estate.

Tax refunds are probably the largest single type of asset which debtors lose in bankruptcy. In New York, the tax refund may protected by your cash exemption up to $2,500, if the bankruptcy was filed prior to January 24, 2011, and up to $6,000, if Chapter 7 Bankruptcy was filed after January 24, 2011, and if you are not claiming a homestead exemption.

The trustees’ goal is to see whether or not a portion of the income tax refund can be pro rated from the beginning of the year to the date of filing bankruptcy. If this prorated portion of the income tax refund is large enough, the trustee may make a demand that a portion fo the refund be turned over to the trustee. If only one spouse is filing for bankruptcy, and they file a joint tax return, Rochester Chapter 7 trustees usually take position that one half of the refund belongs to the trustee, subject to the applicable exemption.

It is important to disclose the tax refund to your lawyer and the bankruptcy trustee, since a bankruptcy trustee can simply write to the Internal Revenue Service and have it send the tax refund directly to the trustee, and a deliberate failure to disclose information can be a basis for a denial of discharge. Some of the Rochester bankruptcy trustees will ask debtors to sign a stipulation at the meeting of the creditors, requiring the debtors to provide copies of their income tax returns as well as a portion or all of the income tax refunds to the trustee. If debtors fail to do so, their bankruptcy discharge may be revoked.

Under the New Law, Federal Bankruptcy Exemptions Are Available In New York

As I have written previously, the new exemption law permits New York residents to choose between the New York exemption statutes and the Federal Exemption that are set forth in Section 522(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The federal exemptions have never been available to debtors filing Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in New York before because New York chose to opt out of the federal exemptions statute in the past.

The federal exemptions have different provisions that may be more favorable for individual debtors than New York’s statutory exemptions. They may allow debtors and their bankruptcy attorneys to protect certain assets that may not be available under New York’s statutory exemptions, provided that debtors do not need to take advantage of their homestead exemption.

The federal exemptions contain a “wild card” exemption that enables consumers to protect a substantial amount of cash, well in excess of New York’s statutory limit.

Specifically, the federal exemptions are as follows:

(1) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $21,625 in value, in real property or personal property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, in a cooperative that owns property that the debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, or in a burial plot for the debtor or a dependent of the debtor.

(2) The debtor’s interest, not to exceed $3,450 in value, in one motor vehicle.

(3) The debtor’s interest, not to exceed $550 in value in any particular item or $11,525 in aggregate value, in household furnishings, household goods, wearing apparel, appliances, books, animals, crops, or musical instruments, that are held primarily for the personal, family, or household use of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor.

(4) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $1,450 in value, in jewelry held primarily for the personal, family, or household use of the debtor or a dependent of the debtor.

(5) The debtor’s aggregate interest in any property, not to exceed in value $1,150 plus up to $10,825 of any unused amount of the exemption provided under paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(6) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed $2,175 in value, in any implements, professional books, or tools, of the trade of the debtor or the trade of a dependent of the debtor.

(7) Any unmatured life insurance contract owned by the debtor, other than a credit life insurance contract.

(8) The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed in value $11,525 less any amount of property of the estate transferred in the manner specified in section 542(d) of this title, in any accrued dividend or interest under, or loan value of, any unmatured life insurance contract owned by the debtor under which the insured is the debtor or an individual of whom the debtor is a dependent.

(9) Professionally prescribed health aids for the debtor or a dependent of the debtor.

(10) The debtor’s right to receive–

(A) a social security benefit, unemployment compensation, or a local public assistance benefit;

(B) a veterans’ benefit;

(D) alimony, support, or separate maintenance, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent of the debtor;

(E) a payment under a stock bonus, pension, profitsharing, annuity, or similar plan or contract on account of illness, disability, death, age, or length of service, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent of the debtor, unless–

(i) such plan or contract was established by or under the auspices of an insider that employed the debtor at the time the debtor’s rights under such plan or contract arose;

(ii) such payment is on account of age or length of service; and

(iii) such plan or contract does not qualify under section 401(a), 403(a), 403(b), or 408 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(11) The debtor’s right to receive, or property that is traceable to–

(A) an award under a crime victim’s reparation law;

(B) a payment on account of the wrongful death of an individual of whom the debtor was a dependent, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent of the debtor;

(C) a payment under a life insurance contract that insured the life of an individual of whom the debtor was a dependent on the date of such individual’s death, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent of the debtor;

(D) a payment, not to exceed $21,625, on account of personal bodily injury, not including pain and suffering or compensation for actual pecuniary loss, of the debtor or an individual of whom the debtor is a dependent; or

(E) a payment in compensation of loss of future earnings of the debtor or an individual of whom the debtor is or was a dependent, to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent of the debtor.

(12) Retirement funds to the extent that those funds are in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Here is an example of how a typical debtor may benefit from using Federal exemptions. If debtor owns a motor vehicle that has $6,000.00 in equity, under the New York exemptions, debtor can only protect $4,000.00 of that equity (plus the New York wildcard exemption, if available). However, if debtor uses the Federal Exemptions, debtor can COMBINE the wildcard exemption with the standard Federal auto exemption of $3,450.00, and use an additional $2,550.00 of the wildcard exemption to protect the remaining equity in that vehicle. As long as debtors do not need to use homestead exemption in excess of the Federal Homestead Exemption of $21,625.00, debtors are likely to benefit from the Federal Exemptions.

Debtors Get More Time to Take Personal Financial Management Course

One of the basic procedural requirements that the debtors have to satisfy before receiving their discharge in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is completing the personal financial management course.

Starting on December 1, 2010, the new rules went into effect giving the debtors in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy 60 days to file a statement of completion of a course in personal financial management. The statement of completion is also known as Official Form 23.

After December 1, 2010, debtors must complete the course within 60 days from the first date set for the meeting of creditors, also know as 341 Hearing. This is an increase of 15 days, up from the prior 45 day time limit.

If debtors fail to satisfy this requirement, they are denied a discharge of their debts. If debtors do not receive their discharge, their bankruptcy was not successful in discharging their debts, and they will not be able to file for bankruptcy again for a long time.

The rules for individuals in Chapter 13 cases were not changed, and still provide that the personal financial management course has to be completed no later than the date when the last payment was made by the debtor as required by the plan or the filing of a motion for discharge.