Rochester – Page 3 – Rochester Bankruptcy and Debt Relief

Upcoming Changes In the Means Test

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of November 1, 2010. Unfortunately, for a lot of jurisdictions it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to decrease.

Through October 31, 2010, a single debtor in New York could have $46,320 in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting November 1, 2010, that figure is dropping to $45,548. Similar declines will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,320 $57,902 $69,174 $82,164

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,548 $56,845 $67,292 $82,587

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the income limit for a family of four has gone up slightly, for smaller families, the income limit has declined. For a family of three, the income limit will decline by nearly two thousand dollars.

The reason for a reduction in the median income is the decline in the American economy. Since the economy is down, employers pay less and employees earn less. As a result, the American median family income has dropped once again. As the income declined, so do the income limits for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. The unfortunate problem resulting from the recession is that as debtors make less money and have more financial problems, it becomes harder for them to qualify for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, New York, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Does the Debtor Need to Be Employed to File Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

It is not necessary to have a job to file for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. In fact, the filing of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is probably one of the few instances in the debtor’s life where it helps the debtor not to be working.

One of the basic requirements of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is that the debtor must show that he or she does not sufficient income available to pay their creditors any money under Chapter 13. Whether the debtor has sufficient income that would require him to be in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy or in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is determined though by the “Means Test.”

A simple explanation of the Means Test is as follows. The Means Test takes the debtor’s income for the six month before the filing of a bankruptcy and compares that income to the average income for a person in the debtor’s state with the same family size. As an example, in New York, where I practice, if a single debtor makes $46,320.00 per year or less, he qualifies to be in a Chapter 7 Bakruptcy. So someone who is not working can file under Chapter 7.

The above is only a part of the Means Tests requirements since the amount of income is only a beginning when the means test calculations are done. Other factors and calculations also have to be considered when making a decision under which Chapter of the Bankruptcy Code the debtor should file .

Sometimes, the debtor can benefit from a loss of a job, usually in a situation where he earns more than the median income for his State, after the loss of the job, once a sufficient period of time passes, the debtor’s average monthly income will be reduced and the debtor will qualify for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

The only time the debtor needs a job to file for bankruptcy is when he is filing for a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

Second Mortgage In Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

It is common for someone who is about to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy to have a pending or upcoming foreclosure action. It is also common for the debtors to have a house that is “under water”, i.e., to owe more on their first mortgage than their house is worth. It is also common for the debtors to have a second mortgage such as a standard mortgage, line of credit or a home equity line of credit. If the first mortgage exceeds the value of the home, it is clear that the second mortgage has no equity in the house to support it, and is fully unsecured.

Once the debtors or their bankruptcy attorney realize the above, the debtors have a choice to make. They can file a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, assuming that they can pass the means test. If the debtors are eligible for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, their personal liability under both mortgages can be eliminated. Then, the debtors can decide to pay the first mortgage only. They may also decide to take a calculated risk that the second mortgage holder would try to foreclose on its mortgage. But would the lender actually commence a foreclosure? Initially, unless the second mortgage holder acquires the first mortgage, it would end up with a house subject to a first mortgage that exceeds what the house is worth. That would likely make any such attempted foreclosure a money losing proposition. Also, if the first mortgage holder forecloses, that foreclosure would eliminate the second mortgage.

Another option that the debtors have is to file Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. While Chapter 13 will carry with it a repayment plan that may last as long as 5 years, it also allows for “lien stripping”, otherwise known as “Pond” motion. In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, the totally unsecured mortgage is wiped away and no longer a lien on the debtors’ home. Then, the second mortgage is treated as unsecured debt that gets repaid in the bankruptcy in accordance with the terms of their repayment plan. According to bankruptcy courts’ decisions, the debtors have to receive a Chapter 13 discharge before the lien is stripped.

Most of the decisions addressing Chapter 7 Bankruptcies hold that the debtors cannot “strip” their fully second unsecured mortgage in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case.

One important reason for many debtors to stay in their house after Chapter 7 is that it may cost them less to pay the mortgage than to rent another place to live. The second mortgage becomes a lot less important since the debtors may be able to strip it right away in Chapter 13, and, if economic conditions don’t improve, the debtors might be able to strip it 4 years from the date they filed their chapter 7 case – when they are eligible for a discharge under Chapter 13.

Another option that may be available to some debtors is to have their mortgage recast under the new Home Mortgage Modification Program. In my experience, here in Rochester, lenders are willing to work with debtors to recast their mortgages. Assuming that the debtors have ability to pay their mortgage, and meet other financial requirements, their mortgage may be modified by their lender.

Who Qualifies For Bankruptcy?

Do I qualify to file a bankruptcy? This is one of the most common questions I am asked as a bankruptcy lawyer when I meet with debtors who are hoping to obtain relief from their debts in bankruptcy court. My answer is usually yes, since almost everyone qualifies for bankruptcy under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.

I think that this question is often asked because of common myths and misinformation that people hear with regard to what bankruptcy is and what it does for the debtor. Unfortunately, there is much misinformation being passed around. It is rare that someone would not qualify for a filing under either chapter of the Bankruptcy Code. If there are horror stories, they typically arise out of situations where someone did not disclose accurate information to the bankruptcy court.

In order to qualify for a bankruptcy relief, the debtor needs to have a reason to file. The primary reason for most debtors is their inability to pay their debts. Whether or not the debtor owns assets is not a a consideration in qualifying to file for bankruptcy. Under New York’s bankruptcy exemptions, a single filer can protect $50,000 in home equity, $2,400 of equity in the vehicle, and there are other exemptions available for other classes of assets.

There are no minimal requirement as to how much debt a debtor must have before filing, nor does this debt has to be reduced to a specific figure. Also, if you are filing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, you are not limited with respect to the property that you can own, but the amount of property may be a factor in the amount of payments under the plan. While there are maximum limits of the amount of debt that can be discharged under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, the vast majority of debtors will not even approach them. In Chapter 7, there are no maximum debt limits. As a result, that Chapter 7 Bankruptcy is available to the debtors regardless of how much debt they owe, and its availability is only limited by the means test. In Chapter 13, you may not have more than $1,010,650 in secured debt and $336,900 in unsecured debt.

Paying For a Bankruptcy

If you are thinking about filing bankruptcy, you are likely having serious financial problems. Eventually, you decide that you decide to have a consultation with a consumer bankruptcy attorney. During your consultation, you and the bankruptcy lawyer discuss the positives and negatives of filing bankruptcy and decide that you will be filing either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. Then you ask the final question, how much will it cost me to file my bankruptcy case?

The attorney will tell you about his attorney’s fee and disbursements for filing fee, credit counselling and debtor education. Then you are likely to ask the following question: where can I get the money and when do I have to pay it?

Initially, lets talk about where that money can come from.

If you are filing a bankruptcy under either Chapter of the Bankruptcy Code, you are generally advised to stop making any payments on unsecured debt, such as credit cards, bank loans, past due medical bills, etc. Debtors are often advised to continue making payments for any asset that they are keeping, such as a car, house, pension loans, rent, etc. As a result, this is likely to improve their cash flow by freeing up the money that was being paid to the unsecured creditors.

If you are not working, or already stopped all payments to creditors, you may need to ask relatives or friends for partial or full payment of the fees and disbursements required in a bankruptcy. While those loans would generally be dischargeable, they can be repaid after the bankruptcy.

Most bankruptcy lawyers offer payment plans. On average, a bankruptcy takes several weeks to prepare and the payments can be spread over that period. Alternatively, you can request additional time prior to the filing while the bankruptcy petition is being prepared.

Paying for bankruptcy is also different depending on whether you are filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, I cannot collect any money from the client against fees or disbursements after the filing of the bankruptcy. It is prohibited by the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, all fees and disbursments must be paid prior to the filing of the petition.

In a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, which results in a repayment plan, with payments of part or all of the debts paid through the bankruptcy court, a portion of the fee can be put into the Chapter 13 plan payment, making it easier on the client and expediting the filing of the bankruptcy petition.

Repaying Debts After the Bankruptcy

Sometimes I am asked by debtors if they can pay their creditors after they received a bankruptcy discharge. My answer to them is that there is nothing in the bankruptcy law that prohibits debtors from voluntarily paying their creditors, either those creditors that are important to you, or all of them. However, for me as a bankruptcy lawyer, it can be a bit difficult to understand since debtors typically file for bankruptcy protection because they cannot afford to pay their creditors. At the same time, I understand that under some circumstances debtors make a deliberate decision to repay someone.

In many different situations, debtors have creditors that are important to them. Those creditors may be family member who have loaned debtors money. Typically, debtors do not want to discharge the debt owed to close relatives. In those situations, my advice is to list the debt but, once the case is over, repay it voluntarily.

Another usual situation is where the debtor may have credit at a small, local store. Since it may be important for the debtor to have that access to such credit, the debtor may choose to pay that debt even after the bankruptcy case is over and the debt is discharged.

From the creditor’s side, once the bankruptcy is filed, the creditor may not contact the debtor to attempt to “persuade” him to “voluntarily” pay the debt. TIf any creditors does this, it would be viewed by the bankruptcy court as an attempt to collect a discharged debt in violation of the discharge injunction.

If the debtor decides to repay a debt after filing for either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, he should be very careful about making payments on a discharged debt. If a creditor were to sue the debtor on a discharged debt in state court, the debtor could raise the fact that the debt was discharged in bankruptcy by raising it as an affirmative defense in state court litigation or he could remove the action to bankruptcy court and allow the bankruptcy court to enforce its discharge injunction. By making payments on a discharged debt, the debtor could create a “waiver” of the bankruptcy discharge on that particular debt.

Upcoming Changes to New York’s Bankruptcy Exemptions

As readers of this blog know, if a debtor is filing for either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in New York, New York’s bankruptcy exemptions will apply. Unfortunately, those exemptions have not been updated in quite some time and are very limited as far as the values of protected assets is concerned.

There is a bill pending in New York State’s legislature that would substantially change the value of assets that could be protected in bankruptcy by changing the figures included in the Debtor and Creditor Law and CPLR which are the basis of those exemptions.

Specifically, this bill would increase the level of certain exemptions from the satisfaction of a money judgment. In addition to the increases, it would add one computer, one cell phone and one motor vehicle worth up to $4,000 to the list. If such vehicle was equipped for use by a disabled person, the limit would be $10,000. The money judgment exemption for the motor vehicle would not apply if the debt enforced is for child support, spousal support, maintenance or alimony.

It would increase the homestead exemption value of a home under Section 5206 of the CPLR from $50,000 to: $150,000 for the counties of Kings, New York, Queens, Bronx, Richmond, Nassau, Suffolk, Rockland, Westchester, and Putnam; $125,000 for the counties of Dutchess, Albany, Columbia, Orange, Saratoga, and Ulster; $75,000 for the remaining counties in the state.

It would also amend Subdivision I of Section 282 of the Debtor and Creditor Law to increase from $2,400 to $4,000 the exemption for one motor vehicle in bankruptcy. If such vehicle was equipped for use by a disabled person, the limit would be $10,000 in bankruptcy. The bill would amend section 283 of the debtor and creditor law to increase the amount of the aggregate individual bankruptcy exemption from $5,000 to $10,000.

The bill would add a new section 285 to the Debtor and Creditor Law to permit debtors to choose either the current federal exemptions or the exemptions in New York Law. The New York State exemptions are listed in Debtor Creditor Law Art 10-A, Sections 282 and 283. Federal exemptions are enumerated in 11 U.S.C. 522(d). It will apply a Cost of Living Adjustment to be published by the New York Banking Department for the applicable exemptions in sections 5205 and 5206 of the CPLR and Section 282 and 283 of the Debtor and Creditor Law.

If those proposed amendments pass into law, the debtors living in Rochester, and Western New York, would be able to protect an additional $25,000 in home equity per filer and also benefit from an increase in the value of vehicle exemption.

More significantly, the debtors will be able to chose between the New York exemptions or the Federal exemption limits. At this time, New York does not allow debtors to make this choice. The ability to utilize federal exemptions will help those debtors who do not own a home more than anything else, because there is a wildcard exemption under Federal Rules. The wildcard exemption, 11 U.S.C. 522(d)(5), typically allows the debtor to exempt a substantial amount of cash, which is presently limited under New York’s exemptions to $2,500.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy and Immigration Status

Can my bankruptcy filing affect my immigration status? This is a question periodically asked by my clients. The answer to that question is actually depends on the particular circumstances of each case, but here are some of the issues that may be relevant.

There is no immigration law, statute, or regulation that specifically forbids individuals who have filed for bankruptcy from applying for naturalization. Additionally, there is no specific question on Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, related to bankruptcy. However, the debtor’s immigration status can be affected if he has not filed required tax returns or if he owes money to the IRS.

While reviewing immigration-related applications, the INS is usually checking to see if an individual seeking naturalization has evidence of “poor moral character” which could be grounds to deny an application. The filing of a bankruptcy petition as a consequence of financial hardship clearly does not rise to the level of “poor moral character.”

However, if you are facing any type of immigration issue and are about to file for either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, you should disclose that fact to your bankruptcy lawyer at your initial consultation as well as discuss your potential bankruptcy filing with your immigration attorney.

If you contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, New York, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Do Both Spouses Have to File for Bankruptcy Together?

While most married people think that if they file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, they must do so with their spouse. That is not true.

Whether one spouse or both file a bankruptcy petition, it’s their choice. It is not uncommon for one spouse to have most of the debt in his or her name only, in which case an individual filing would more appropriate. However, if both spouses are have a significant amount of debt, they should file together.

Sometimes I meet with only one spouse because the other spouse is is not willing to file for bankruptcy. In these situations, one spouse to file the bankruptcy petition and obtain necessary relief from the bankruptcy court.

There are also some additional issues that need to be considered. Initially, if only one spouse is filing and the couple is residing together, the other spouse’s income may be relevant for the purpose of household income as reflected on Schedule I, resulting disposable income reflected on Schedule J, and that spouse’s income may also be relevant for the means test.

As far as the means test, it is necessary to determine whether there is a presumption that there is enough disposable income available to give unsecured creditors sufficient payment under a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan, such that permitting a Chapter 7 could be considered an abuse of discretion. But even if the means test is passed, and no presumption of abuse arises, or, alternatively, if this is a non-consumer bankruptcy and the means test is not even required, abuse can still be found given the totality of the circumstances. The income and assets of the non-filing spouse are important in both those considerations. If the debtor has legal rights to share in the income and assets of a non-filing spouse or even if the practice has been between spouses to share income and assets regardless of legal rights, the bankruptcy law tells us that the debtor’s access to the non-filing spouse’s income and assets has to be considered in deciding whether the bankruptcy court would permitting a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing.

An experienced bankruptcy attorney can analyze each consumer’s financial situation and suggest whether a married couple should file an individual or a joint petition.

Do Divorce Settlements Survive Bankruptcy?

I have previously written about interplay between divorce, family court proceedings and bankruptcy, as well as other issues involving interplay between bankruptcy and family law. One issue that is highly significant in situations where one of the former spouses is about to file a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is whether the bankruptcy trusee will seek to undo a divorce settlement agreement.

With bankruptcy filings being so common, and divorce being a major reason for seeking bankruptcy relief, divorce lawyers are frequently concerned as to whether a divorce settlement will be upheld in a bankruptcy proceeding.

There are valid reasons to be cautious since if a debtor transfers a valuable asset to a spouse (or soon-to-be ex-spouse) prior to filing for bankruptcy, and the debtor-spouse does not receive reasonable value in return, then the transfer may be deemed to be a “fraudulent transfer.” In such a case, the bankruptcy trustee can sue the person who received the asset to recover it for the bankruptcy estate, so that all creditors can share in its value. As with any other situations involving fraudulent transfers, the debtor must have been insolvent at the time of transfer.

In order to demonstrate that a transfer was not a fraudulent transfer, the party who received the transfer would have to show that there was “reasonably equivalent value.” It is common for a divorcing spouse to settle the divorce case by giving the other spouse valuable assets such as an interest in real estate, bank accounts, investments, or other personal property. In those situations, both parties do not want a bankruptcy trustee to try to set such transfers aside.

There was a time when some of the bankruptcy courts have held that innocent spouses who received such a transfer were no different from any other party who received a large transfer without sufficient consideration. However, a case decided by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in June of 2009 will give many divorcing spouses a greater degree of certainty that a trustee will not be able to set aside a divorce settlement.

The decision in Bledsoe v. Bledsoe, 569 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2009) this issue by addressing when a bankruptcy court may avoid a transfer made pursuant to a state-court divorce decree. The Circuit Court affirmed that decision and held that a trustee can only set aside a matrimonial settlement if he alleges and proves “extrinsic fraud.” The Court also held that a divorce decree that follows from a regularly conducted, contested divorce proceeding conclusively establishes “reasonably equivalent value” in the absence of fraud or collusion. Since the Second Circuit has not addressed this issue, Bledsoe is valid law in the bankruptcy courts in New York. At the same time, the bankruptcy court, here in Rochester, New York, and elsewhere, will always review the totality of the facts.

In order for a divorce settlement to be upheld by the bankruptcy court, it must be ratified by the matrimonial court. That means that any transfer should be accurately described in a stipulation of settlement. In addition, the stipulation must be specifically referred to and incorporated in the judgment of divorce. It is not enough that the parties merely stipulate to a settlement; the court must specifically approve the settlement. In a typical judgment of divorce, this is accomplished by stating that the stipulation survives the judgment of divorce and is not merged into it.