Rochester Bankruptcy and Debt Relief

Periodically, I meet with debtors who own either second vehicles or motorcycles, and would like to keep them, after either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy filing.  Filing for either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy doesn’t always mean that you have to give up your second vehicle or motorcycle, as long as the payments are considered a reasonable vehicle expense.  The second vehicle, referred to above, is the vehicle that is an extra one for the single debtor, or the third one for joint filers.

How does the debtor know if the second car or motorcycle will be considered a reasonable expense?  The answer to this question initially depends on the type of bankruptcy being considered: Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.

Since with Chapter 7 Bankruptcy there is no repayment plan for creditors, the secured debts, like vehicle loans, are either continue to be paid by the debtor or the vehicles are surrendered. The debtor is obligated to list his/her income and expenses in the bankruptcy petition. The purpose of listing income and expenses is to show that after deducting reasonable expenses, the debtor has no money with which to repay his creditors. If there is any significant money left over in the budget (more than about $100), the debtor will not qualify for Chapter 7. Instead, he will be required to file a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy where creditors are repaid some or all of what they are owed.

If the Chapter 7 debtor’s monthly income equals to his/her monthly expenses, the debtor has no money with which to repay his creditors in a Chapter 13. However, those expenses must be reasonable or the trustee will object to the bankruptcy. This is the critical issue in whether the debtor will be able to keep the second vehicle or motorcycle.  Usually if teh budget shows that even befor the payment on the second vehicle or motorcycle, the debtor is either at break-even, or is in the negative territory, the bankruptcy court will not require him to give it up.  If the debtor wants to spend less on other expenses, the debtor can do that.  If the debtor wants to make the payments, he can keep the second vehicle or motorcycle.  An additional caveat has to do with any equity in such second vehicle.  If there is any equity, the trustee is likely to demand that such equity be paid to the bankruptcy estate since it would not be protected by teh bankruptcy exemptions.

The above also applies for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.  In Chapter 13, any vehicle payments allowed in the repayment plan take money away from what the unsecured creditors receive.  So a payment for the second vehicle or motorcycle will reduce the money the trustee has available to repay other claims and is likely to be objected to.  Here in Rochester, the bankruptcy trustee will permit the debtor to keep the second vehicle or motorcycle if the plan repays all unsecured debtors at 100%.  So, if the joint debtors, for example, are a couple with three vehicle payments, three vehicle payments are not necessary for “the effective reorganization of the debtor” required by the bankruptcy statute.  The second vehicle or motorcycle is likely to be toy, and allowing the toy to be paid off in the plan reduces the amount the unsecured creditors receive.

The easiest way to determine whether the second vehicle or a motorcycle will be viewed as an allowable expense in Chapter 7 bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy  is to discuss these issues with a bankruptcy lawyer prior to making a decision to file.

If you contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

I am often asked whether the debtors here in Rochester will get to meet the Bankruptcy Court Judge during their 341 meeting, otherwise known as the meeting of the creditors.  My usual response to this question is no, since the bankruptcy court judges are barred by law from attending the meeting of the creditors.

While the meeting of creditors is open and the public can attend it, the bankruptcy judge assigned to the case may not do so. While it seems counterintuitive, the reasons for this is to avoid any perception of bias on the part of the judge. Prior to 1979, when the current version of the bankruptcy code became effective, a bankruptcy court judge was able to attend the meeting of creditors.  However, the Congress decided that it was necessary to prohibit judges from attending the meeting.

Accordingly, Bankruptcy Code section 341(c) provides that “the court may not preside at, and may not attend, any meeting under this section.” Although the local meeting of creditors is held in the Rochester Federal Courthouse, it is not a court hearing and the trustee presiding over the meeting is not a judicial officer.  I tell the debtors that in most Chapter 7 consumer bankruptcy cases, the debtor will never appear before the judge assigned to the case.

If I am asked the same question about the Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, my question will be the opposite since as a part of any Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the debtors will have to attend a confirmation hearing which, in Rochester, will be presided by Judge Ninfo.

If you contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, New York, bankruptcy lawyer.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you should stop using your credit cards.  Once you’ve decided to file for bankruptcy, any credit card use after that point will be highly scrutinized by both the credit card issuer and the bankruptcy trustee, and is likely to be viewed with a great deal of suspicion.  The reasons for this are obvious.  If the debtor decides that he is seeking to eliminate his credit card debt through Chapter 7 bankruptcy, or pay a lesser amount though a Chapter 13 filing, then incurring additional credit card debt can be considered fraudulent.  Specifically, the credit card issuer will make an argument that the additional debt was incurred without intention to repay, then the discharge can be objected to. Also, the issuer will also look at all of the transactions to verify that the money was not spent on such things as vacation trips, or that other unnecessary spending didn’t take place.  If a credit card issuer learns that a debtor used a card without any intention of making full payment, then the credit card company has the right to object to the debtor’s discharge of that particular debt.

Also, if the bankruptcy trustee, or United States Trustee, learn that the debtor intentionally ran up his credit cards before filing, then either trustee can seek to have the debtor’s discharge denied or move to have the case dismissed.  There is also the possibility that the debtor can be found to have engaged in bankruptcy fraud, which is a criminal offense.

While consumer Chapter 7 bankruptcy allows the debtor to eliminate all credit card debts and get a fresh new financial start, the debtor should not jeopardize his ability to seek bankruptcy protection by engaging in self-serving or foolish behavior.  There is simply no reason to create problems for the upcoming bankruptcy filing.  Therefore, don’t use your credit cards once you’ve decided to file bankruptcy.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a New York bankruptcy lawyer.

I spend a fair amount of time in 341 hearings.  While waiting for my bankruptcy cases to be called, I listen to the trustee asking debtors and their lawyers questions about bankruptcy petitions.  In my experience, one thing that always that gets bankruptcy trustee worked up, are incomplete or inaccurate bankruptcy petitions.  Because the bankruptcy petition is signed by the debtors who, by signing it, certify its accuracy, debtors’ failure to read their bankruptcy petitions and lack of awareness of factual errors or omissions that they contain may cause significant problems.

While a completed bankruptcy petition usually runs between 30 and 40 pages, it is not an exciting read, and contains plenty of legalese, as well as recitals of the debtors’ financial assets, income, expenses,a a list of all the creditors.  However, by signing it, the debtor certifies that he/she not only read it, but that all information contained in the petition is true and correct, just as if the debtor testified to that information under oath.  At the beginning of every 341 hearing, the trustee asking the debtor if he/she read the bankruptcy petition before having signed it, reviewed it with his/her bankruptcy attorney, and if everything in the petition is true and correct.

Trustees get very upset at debtors because their petitions weren’t accurate or complete.   A typical debtor would tell the trustee, “I didn’t notice a mistake or omission and it needs to be corrected,”  but later admit they did not read the petition carefully.  When the bankruptcy petition is missing important information and that information could have been easily corrected by the debtor, the debtor’s credibility is greatly reduced.  If the petition is completely inaccurate, the trustee can allege that the debtor was engaging in fraudulent and deceptive conduct.

In my practice, I insist that my clients read every page of their petition and review it with me before they sign it.  Even if the client want to rely on my work, the petition has to be read by every client who must understand its contents.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy lawyer.

In the last few months, I have received a number of calls from owners of small businesses who want to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy, primarily due to credit card debt, but want to continue to operate their businesses.  In most of these cases, the business owner have used personal credit cards to fund business operations.  Since the time the credit cards were used, the business improved, and is now profitable or would be profitable where it not for the payments on credit card debt.

Unfortunately, in this type of situation, filing bankruptcy comes with a price.  If you own a small business and are incorporated, the shares of that business are assets of the bankruptcy estate.  Further, any accounts receivable of the business are an asset of the business that belong to the shareholder.  Thus, if the shareholder files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will treat the shares in the business, value them, and will try to sell them

Except in the case of a personal service business that has no significant inventory, receivables or any valuable assets, other than the experience and labor of its owner, the bankruptcy trustee will demand that the owner cease operating the business, and produce its records, value its assets and disclose other information related to the  business to the trustee.  As a result, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing is likely to result in the business being shut down, and its owner being forced to start over.  Once the bankruptcy is completed, a new corporate entity can be formed and, assuming that the owner is able to resume operations and the business can be profitable, operations can be restarted.

Besides Chapter 7 bankruptcy, there are other options.  Under appropriate circumstances, an owner of a small business can file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy assuming that the business is being operated as a sole proprietorship, and, if the business is large enough, Chapter 11 bankruptcy may be an option.  In a Chapter 13 filing, it is usually difficult to predict what the cash flow of the business will be like and, therefore, it is difficult to come up with a bankruptcy payment plan.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy lawyer.

A question that I commonly hear from debtors in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcies in Rochester or surrounding  counties, is whether when they file for bankruptcy, someone will come to their house or apartment, and search or remove their assets.  My typical response is to reassure them by telling them that in my experience, any such visits are extremely rare, and would only serve to verify the accuracy of their bankruptcy petition and other disclosure provided during their bankruptcy case.  At the same time, as a bankruptcy lawyer, any such statements makes me concerned, since whether or not someone will actually come to search your house or apartment if you file for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the petition, schedules and statement of financial affairs must to be completed truthfully and accurately. Any attempt by the debtor to conceal assets, or any dishonest statements in the bankruptcy petition or other information provided during the bankruptcy, if caught, are likely to result in a referral to the U.S. Attorney Office for criminal prosecution.  There are currently individuals serving time in federal penitentiary who have been convicted of bankruptcy crimes, including those whose bankruptcy crimes cases were prosecuted in Rochester.  In addition, the financial consequences of the dismissal of the bankruptcy case, and denial of discharge, can be significant, even if there is no criminal prosecution.

With respect to obtaining access to the debtor’s house or apartment, the bankruptcy trustee has the ability to obtain an order authorizing him or her to search the debtor’s house or apartment, with the assistance of the United States Marshall, and to break doors, locks and safes during the course of an investigation. Usually such order will be obtained on an ex parte basis — meaning without prior notice to the debtor to prevent him or her from hiding the assets.

As I have written before, when you file Chapter 7 bankruptcy, you receive the benefit of bankruptcy exemptions.  For most debtors, the exemptions allow them to keep most, if not all, of the property they own.  While each case is fact specific, and depends of the property owned and its value, a bankruptcy lawyer will be able to engage in pre-bankruptcy exemption planning to maximize available exemptions, and to minimize the assets that would have to be turned over to the trustee if their value exceeds permissible exemptions.

Therefore, the bankruptcy petition, and all of the schedules and other documents provided to the bankruptcy court,  should be prepared truthfully and completely, while understanding that the trustee in your bankruptcy case has the ability to get a court order authorizing him to verify the accuracy of your petition.  If the debtor provided truthful and accurate disclosure, he or she has nothing to fear.  As a bankruptcy attorney, I work closely with all of my clients to make sure that they understand their obligations as debtors, but also to make sure they get to keep as much property as they are legally allowed.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy lawyer.

When a debtor files for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, all of the debtor’s assets pass under control of the bankruptcy trustee.   The reason for this transfer of control is so the debtor will be able to discharge their debts and receive the benefit of automatic stay.  As I discussed previously, once a bankruptcy is filed, a bankruptcy estate is created by operation of the Bankruptcy Code which states that the bankruptcy estate is “comprised of all the following property, wherever located and by whomever held: (1) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c)(2) of this section, all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1) (2008).  Under the definition of the property of the estate, it also includes any interest in property that would have been property of the estate if such interest had been an interest of the debtor on the date of the filing of the petition, and that the debtor acquires or becomes entitled to acquire within 180 days after such date. This particular provision dealing with assets acquired within 180 days addresses inheritances and bequests.  Therefore, if the debtor receives an  inheritance, or a bequest, within 180 days of the filing for bankruptcy, that inheritance or bequest, become property of the bankruptcy estate.

Since a typical Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy runs its course within less than 180 days, a bequest or an inheritance may come within 180 days of the filing, but after the debtor receives his or her discharge or a confirmed plan.  Under those circumstances, the debtor has an absolute obligation to notify the bankruptcy trustee of the bequest or inheritance.  Once the money is actually received, the debtor must turn over the funds to the trustee.  Here in Rochester, Chapter 7 and 13 trustee specifically tell debtors during 341 meetings that any inheritance or bequest received within 180 days of the filing must be disclosed to the bankruptcy trustee.  While most of the time, debtors can protect their personal or real property through the use of exemptions and pre-filing planning, inheritances or bequests do not provide this opportunity.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy lawyer.

As I have previously written, Chapter 13 bankruptcies involve many different issues.  Once thing that bankruptcy lawyers point out to all debtors entering Chapter 13 bankruptcy is that the debtor has to make payments to the trustee, prior to the confirmation of the plan, and, of course, after the plan is confirmed.  Sometimes, the debtor is unable to make payments, and, rather than asking his/her bankruptcy attorney to seek modification of the plan, does nothing.  Under those circumstances, the Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee will move to have the bankruptcy dismissed.  Once the motion to dismiss is granted, and creditors resume collections activities, such as foreclosure, can the debtor refile?

The debtor can refile Chapter 13 bankruptcy, if it has been dismissed, at any time.  However, changes to the Bankruptcy Code that were in Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) can limit the relief that the debtor  receives when he/she refiles.  If the Chapter 13 bankruptcy is refiled within one year of the dismissal, the automatic stay is in effect only for 30 days.  This is a critical difference between a refiled Chapter 13 bankruptcy and the original filing.  It means that within 30 days of the filing, the debtor’s attorney must file a motion in bankruptcy court seeking to extend the automatic stay.  If the motion is not made, or granted by the bankruptcy court, creditors can resume collection activity.

In general, before a motion to dismiss is filed, or granted, the debtor should contact his/her bankruptcy lawyer to discuss all available options, including converting Chapter 13 to Chapter 7 bankruptcy, or amending the plan.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy attorney.

As I have previously written about the procedural steps involved in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, once the debtor attends 341 hearing, and the bankruptcy plan is filed, the next important event is the confirmation hearing.

The date set for the confirmation of Chapter 13 plans varies depending on where the case is filed. Here in Rochester, the date for the confirmation hearing is typically set between 30 and 60 days after the 341 hearing.  The debtor(s) is required to attend it as the proposed plan is reviewied by the court and Chapter 13 Trustee.  If the debtor fails to appear for the hearing, the judge can prevent or delay the confirmation. In other Courts, such as those in the Northern District of New York, confirmation hearings are usually scheduled approximately 60 days after the proposed Chapter 13 plan is filed with the Court.

Unlike other jurisdictions, here in Rochester, Judge Ninfo reviews each Chapter 13 bankruptcy case and the circumstances that led the debtor to file for bankruptcy.  In addition, Judge Ninfo requires that a debtor file a checklist specifying the reasons that led to the filing.  In addition, if the amount of unsecured debt exceeds $75,000, the debtor will be also required to file with the court a detailed letter of explanation, describing how the debt was accumulated.  Also, approximately one week before the hearing, the Chapter 13 Trustee will file his report analyzing the case and either recommending confirmation of the plan or giving reasons why confirmation should be denied.

In cases where an objection to confirmation is filed, a confirmation hearing is held on the scheduled date and the objecting party, or its attorney, typically attends.  The views of the debtor’s attorney, the objecting parties’ attorney and the Trustee are heard by the judge, who either confirms the plan, denies confirmation, or sets an evidentiary hearing on the disputed matter (which could be a valuation issue, a bad faith objection, a disposable income objection, etc.).  Often the confirmation hearing is simply adjourned to allow the parties some time to try to resolve their differences.

The confirmation hearing is the critical step in any Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  It is the responsibility of the bankruptcy lawyer to present a plan that not only protects his/her client(s) interests by making the payments manageable, but also to make sure that the plan will be confirmed by the court.  That usually involves analyzing the parties’ income and expenses, and make certain that the budget is not excessive or has any frivolous expenses.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy attorney.

What happens if the debtors fail to disclose certain assets in their Chapter 13 bankruptcy and those assets come to light after the confirmation of their Chapter 13 plan?  This situation was recently addressed by Judge Ninfo of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York in In re Cram.

On March 24, 2004, Richard and Pamela S. Cram filed a petition in Rochester, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York, initiating a Chapter 13 case.  A Chapter 13 trustee was appointed.  On their Schedule B of Personal Property, the debtors stated that they had no “[o]ther contingent and unliquidated claims of [any] nature….”.  On April 30, 2004, the court orally confirmed their Chapter 13 Plan, and on October 5, 2004 an order confirming the plan was entered.

At the time the bankruptcy was filed, the debtors had a pending medical malpractice claim which resulted a subsequent lawsuit. On June 14, 2005, the debtors’ lawyer filed an amendment to their Schedule B of Personal  Property, which amended the answer to question No. 20 regarding contingent and unliquidated claims, but did not amend their Schedule C to claim any proceeds that might be received from the malpractice claim as exempt.

Between June  14,  2005  and  April  7,  2008  the  debtors  or  their attorneys did not notify the court of the existence of the pre-petition medical malpractice claim set forth in the amendment, which was a Section 541 asset of the estate at the time the court confirmed their plan, even though in confirming their plan pursuant to Section 1325(a), the court believed that the requirement of  Section 1325(a)(4),  that the creditors would receive at least as much under the plan that they would in a Chapter 7 liquidation.

Section 1325(a)(4) provides that:

(a)  Except as provided in subsection (b), the court shall confirm a plan if—
(4) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of property to be distributed under  the plan on account of each allowed unsecured claim is not less than the amount that  would be paid on such claim if the estate of the debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 of this title on such date[.] 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (2009).

This section is known as “the best interests test”.

Once the trustee learned of the settlement, he moved to revoke the discharge, as well as for other relief.  He asserted that on April 28, 2008, after the discharge order had been entered on April 7, 2008, the trustee learned that the claim had been settled on or about February 20, 2008 for $125,000 and that neither the debtors, their bankruptcy attorneys nor their personal injury attorney ever notified the trustee of the settlement or any prior settlement offers. The trustee argued, inter alia, that in view of the settlement, the debtors’ confirmed plan did not meet the best interests test.

Unlike in Chapter 7 cases, the court, in confirming a plan in a Chapter 13 case, makes an affirmative determination, as required by Section 1325(a), that, among other things, the plan meets the best interests test. Judge Ninfo held that because of the debtors’ failure to disclose the malpractice claim, which was a  Section 541 pre-petition asset of the estate, either at the time of the oral confirmation of their plan or when the confirmation order was entered, the plan did not meet the best interests test, and neither the debtors, nor the trustee, ever corrected that failure by taking the necessary steps to insure that the plan was amended to include the proceeds of any recovery on the malpractice claim, either before or after the settlement. Thus, the confirmation order had to be vacated, and with no confirmed plan completed, the debtors would not be entitled to a Section 1328 discharge and the court vacated the confirmation order pursuant to Section 105(a).

Judge Ninfo further held that when the debtors filed the amendment to include the malpractice claim, they, as debtors, and their bankruptcy attorneys, as officers of the court, had an affirmative obligation to advise the court, not simply the trustee or their creditors, of the undisclosed asset, so that the court would be aware that its confirmation of the plan was improper and its confirmation order incorrectly entered, and could insure that the confirmation order was vacated or a proper modification to the plan filed to include any recovery.

The court further granted trustee’s motion to dismiss the bankruptcy, unless prior to July 6, 2009, the debtors:  (a) pay to the trustee the amount necessary for the trustee to make a distribution to their unsecured creditors of 100% plus 9%; or (b) otherwise make arrangements with the trustee for the payment of the necessary amount within a reasonable period of time that is acceptable to the trustee and the trustee files with the court the details of such an acceptable arrangement.

The lesson of this case is that the debtors and their bankruptcy lawyers have an affirmative obligation to disclose any and all assets of the debtors, including any contingent or unliquidated claims.  In this case, the consequences to the debtors could have been much more severe.

If you are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a bankruptcy attorney.