Rochester Bankruptcy and Debt Relief » Rochester

Bankruptcy and Cash Advances

alexkorotkin — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:48:47 +0000

Most of my Chapter 7 bankruptcy clients have a lot of credit card debt that was accumulated over time. That debt may have come from making purchases, incurring services charges and interest, as well as taking cash advances on credit card. While most of credit card debts are dischargeable in bankruptcy, credit card cash advances may represent a significant problem for potential bankruptcy filer.

According to the Bankruptcy Code, any cash advance, or combination of cash advances from one lender, totaling more than $875, obtained within 70 days of the bankruptcy filing date is presumed to be non-dischargeable. This particular provision is included in Section 523(a)(2)(C)(i)(II). The dollar amount of the cash advance, changes every three years.

This provision was included in the Bankruptcy Code because the Congress was concerned that consumers, who obtained significant cash advances relatively close to time they filed for bankruptcy, knew or should have known that they would be seeking bankruptcy relief, and should not be able to eliminate such debts. Another reason for that provision was to prevent consumers from taking cash advances immediately prior to a bankruptcy filing.

However, in terms of procedural issues associated with cash advances taken out with 70 days prior to the filing, in order to have the court declare that the debt is non-dischargeable, the creditor must file objections in the bankruptcy court. Specifically, the creditor must file an adversary proceeding. Since there are filing fees and other expenses associated with such filings, if the amount of the cash advance is not particularly large, most creditors will not bother filing an adversarial proceeding.

However, since a cash advance may result in an adversary proceeding, I always ask my clients about them and, in appropriate situation, may ask the client to postpone the bankruptcy filing until after the expiration of the 70 day period.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Who Will Be the Next Bankruptcy Judge in Rochester?

alexkorotkin — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:47:43 +0000

At the end of the year, Judge John C. Ninfo II, who has been presiding over the bankruptcy court in Rochester since 1992, will be retiring. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has been interviewing candidates to replace Judge Ninfo since early this fall.

However, since the Second Circuit has not made its selection so far, the Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York has established a contingency plan for January and February 2012. The Hon. Michael Kaplan, one of the two Buffalo bankruptcy judges, will be coming to Rochester and Watkins Glen to preside over motions and hearings.

The administrative order posted on the Court’s Website states that the motion calendars for Rochester in January and February will be held on Fridays rather than Wednesdays, but will not be changed otherwise. Since Judge Ninfo has presided over the bankruptcy court in Rochester for the last 20 years, Judge Kaplan may represent a significant change and Rochester bankruptcy lawyers will have to learn about his approach to bankruptcy cases and judicial philosophy.

Upcoming Changes in Bankruptcy Filing Fees

alexkorotkin — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:22:23 +0000

I have previously discussed fees associated with both Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. As of November 1, 2011, those fees are going to increase for the first time in several years.

The filing fee for filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy will increase by $7. For Chapter 7, the filing fee will increase from $299 to $306. The Chapter 13 filing fee will rise from $274 to $281. The Court Clerk for the Western District of New York announced changes in the filing fees on the bankruptcy court’s website on October 17, 2011. The cost of filing an adversary proceeding and various motions is rising as well.

Upcoming Changes to the Means Test Figures

alexkorotkin — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:08:44 +0000

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of November 1, 2011. In New York, it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to decrease.

Through October 31, 2011, a single debtor in New York could have $46,295 in income in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting November 1, 2011, that figure is decreasing to $45,931. Similar decreases will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,295 $57,777 $68,396 $83,942

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,931 $56,113 $66,953 $81,212

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the decreases are not large, they are going to make it more difficult for some individuals and families to qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

The figures used for the each state’s median income are based on United States Census data, and adopted by the Office of the United States Trustee. Usually, these figures are adjusted based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers once or twice per year.

When the economy is growing, typically income rises because of the cost of living increases, inflation and other reasons. When the economy is not growing, income actually decreased from the prior year. As a result, the means test is adjusted and lower median income figures are used which make it more difficult for debtors to qualify for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

If you are contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, New York, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Cell Phones and Bankruptcy

alexkorotkin — Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:48:18 +0000

Filing bankruptcy can release a debtor from an expensive cell phone contract and let debtor discharge the early termination penalty. While now almost everyone has a cell phone, the contracts are typically long term and it is easy for a debtor to run up a substantial bill. Should a typical consumer debtor filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy list their cell phone provider as a creditor for bankruptcy purposes?

If debtor has an outstanding bill on a closed account, then such bill must be included with the rest of the outstanding debts. Any such bill will be eliminated by the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy filing, or paid in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

In addition, the bankruptcy filing would enable the debtor to not only eliminate their balance but remove their obligation to pay any early cancellation penalty. Filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy has the effect of terminating any “executory contract” which is one in which the parties are still performing it. Cell phone contracts are executory contracts during the contract period. By including the cell phone provider as a creditor in the bankruptcy petition, the contract is automatically terminated, and any early cancellation penalty becomes a dischargeable debt just like the credit card debts. Some cell phone companies may request a security deposit after the bankruptcy filing, but, in my experience, most providers will not ask for a security deposit.

If debtor plans to keep the account, the account must be listed in the bankruptcy petition. Debtors should list the cell phone provider as a potential creditor in the bankruptcy petition, even if no balance is owed. Although the bankruptcy law has the effect of automatically terminating the cell phone contract, virtually all cell phone companies will continue service if the account is current, and will not pay any attention to the bankruptcy filing. The advantage to the debtor is that by including the cell phone company in the petition, even if it is current, is that the contract can later be terminated before the end of the typical two-year period, and the debtor will not be responsible for the early termination penalty.

In addition to the above, debtors should always include their cell phones in Schedule B which lists all of their personal property. Here in Rochester, Chapter 7 trustees have been raising this issue during 341 meetings and asking debtors about the cell phones they owns. Since some of the phones, such as an iPhone, are valuable, trustees can look at them as one more potential asset in the bankruptcy estate.

If you contemplating filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, or are dealing with debt problems in Western New York, including Rochester, Canandaigua, Brighton, Pittsford, Penfield, Perinton, Fairport, Webster, Victor, Farmington, Greece, Gates, Hilton, Parma, Brockport, Spencerport, LeRoy, Chili, Churchville, Monroe County, Ontario County, Wayne County, Orleans County, Livingston County, and being harassed by bill collectors, and would like to know more about how bankruptcy may be able to help you, contact me today by phone or email to schedule a FREE initial consultation with a Rochester, NY, bankruptcy lawyer.

Bankruptcy, Credit Unions and Cross-Collateralization of Loans

alexkorotkin — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:41:54 +0000

One issue that periodically comes up in bankruptcy cases is cross-collateralization of assets by credit unions. What does that mean? Cross-collateralization is basically the use of collateral from one loan to secure other loans.

Most credit unions, including local credit unions here in Rochester, New York, use “Loanliner” documents. These form agreements are used by financial institutions for their lending transactions. Included in standard Loanliner lending agreements is a provision in which the borrower agrees that all other loans with the lender are cross-collateralized. The cross-collateralization clause from a recent Loanliner agreement reads: “the security interest also secures any other loans, including any credit card loan, you have now or receive in the future from us and any other amounts you owe us for any reason now or in the future.”

Credit unions often use this clause in vehicle loan agreements to secure all other credit union debts with the vehicle. This may surprise someone when they discover that the debt on the car may include a personal loan, a line of credit, and credit card balances.

There are a few options in bankruptcy if the debtor has a cross-collateralized auto loan. If a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy case is filed, the debtor can request that the credit union prepare a reaffirmation agreement for the vehicle without regard to other debts. In this situation, the debtor is asking the credit union to voluntarily strip off the cross-collateralized loans. If the credit union rejects such request, the debtor has two options: (1) surrender the vehicle and discharge all debts to the credit union; or (2) redeem the vehicle.

If the debtor surrenders the car, the credit union takes the car back and sells it, usually at auction. Any deficiency left on the car loan and all additional cross-collateralized debts owed to the credit union are discharged in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. If the debtor in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy chooses to redeem the car, the debtor gets to keep a vehicle by paying the value of the vehicle, not the total debt that is owed. While somewhat similar to a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cram-down, redemption requires that the payment to the secured creditor must be made in a lump sum and does not allow for payments over time.

If the debtor is filing a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, the loan can be crammed-down to match the vehicle’s value provided that the loan is over 910 days old. Any remaining debt is treated as unsecured debt and is discharged at the end of the Chapter 13 case. Another option is to surrender the vehicle just as in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

Importance of Providing Accurate Information in Your Bankruptcy Petition and Schedules

alexkorotkin — Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:00:19 +0000

I have previously written how important it is for debtors to provide their bankruptcy attorney with accurate and complete information. Debtors have an absolute obligation under the Bankruptcy Code to disclose their assets, liabilities and income to the bankruptcy court. Once in a while, a debtor may forget a creditor or overlook an old debt. Not every debt appears on the credit report either. When a debt is omitted from the bankruptcy petition, under the Bankruptcy Code, there are several possible solutions.

Initially, if the debtor realizes that a debt was overlooked during the bankruptcy, the debtor is required to file amended schedules and identify the creditor. If this happens, the bankruptcy attorney should be notified and he will amend the schedules.

If a pre-bankruptcy debt is discovered after the bankruptcy case has been closed and discharge granted, there are a couple of possible options. In some situations, it will be necessary to request that the bankruptcy court reopens the bankruptcy case and discharge the debt. In other situations, especially in no asset Chapter 7 Bankruptcy cases, the debt is considered discharged as a matter of law, even though it wasn’t listed in the schedules. Finally, some types of debt, such as student loans, cannot be discharged under most circumstances, and will survive the bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy courts expect the debtor to provide a full and complete disclosure of both assets and liabilities. In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy asset cases and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases, an omission matters a great deal since listed creditors receive payments through the bankruptcy court. If a debtor deliberately fails to list a creditor, that debt is likely be declared non-dischargeable and will survived the bankruptcy. Under appropriate circumstances, courts have denied debtor a bankruptcy discharge because of the debtor’s intentional failure to list all debts or revoked already issued discharge.

Utility Services After Bankruptcy

alexkorotkin — Sat, 07 May 2011 02:48:44 +0000

There are times when debtors need to discharge debts owed to their local utilities. However, often the debtor has to come back to the same utility after discharging the debt owed to it in either Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. The utility has to provide services to the debtor, provided that the debtor complies with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The following will describe applicable law and practices common in Rochester, New York, area.

In general, the Bankruptcy Code requires utilities to continue to provide service after a bankruptcy filing, since debtors need electricity and heat as much as anyone else. The Bankruptcy Code authorizes utilities to charge a security deposit in exchange for providing their services.

In Rochester, Rochester Gas & Electric (RG& E) is the largest utility company. When RG&E receives a notice that they have been listed as a creditor on a bankruptcy, RG&E will close the existing account and open a new account (with a new account number) for the debtor. RG&E will calculate what is owed on the account as of the date the bankruptcy petition was filed. If RG&E is listed as a creditor in a bankruptcy case, they will request that a debtor provide them with a security deposit. They calculate the amount of the deposit at two months of average utility bills, with the deposit being due within 30 days of after RG&E sends out the security deposit request. The deadline for the deposit cannot be changed. After the debtor has made timely payments for a year, his deposit will be returned.

The above guidelines were discussed in a decision by the Bankruptcy Court Judge, John C. Ninfo II, which addressed these issues in In re Spencer. Judge Ninfo decided that:

1) Absent extraordinary circumstances, public utilities, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 366(b) may require a Ch. 7, 11 or 13 residential customer to pay a security deposit equal to the highest two months, without late charges, of the previous twelve months.
2) While a case is still open, if a post-petition utility payment is more than 10 days late, the utility may apply to the court (on two business days notice to debtor and attorney) for an order authorizing termination of service should the debtor fail to pay any two consecutive monthly statements by the due date. The attorney for the debtor can set up a telephone conference and oppose the application if circumstances warrant it.
3) Should a residential customer who has made a two month security deposit be late in paying any statement, the utility may commence “whatever procedures are available to it under applicable state law and regulations to terminate service, so that it will be in a position to terminate service at the earliest permissible time before or after the debtor’s case is closed.

My concern as attorney representing debtors is that it may be difficult for my clients to come up with a substantial deposit. At the same time, I recognize that my clients have to pay for the service they receive, and that they already benefited from discharging their prior utility bills in bankruptcy.

Hardship Discharge in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

alexkorotkin — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:26:18 +0000

When a debtor files for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in New York, the typical end result is either a 3 or 5 year plan requiring the debtor to pay his disposable income to the bankruptcy trustee, who in turn will pay to the debtor’s creditors. Occasionally, a debtor may suffer further financial reverses or health problems, so that the repayment plan is no longer affordable, and there is not possibility of modifying the plan. While one of the options is converting the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy into Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, it may not always be possible because of the means test issues.

If debtor can’t keep up with Chapter 13 plan payments, U.S. Bankruptcy Code includes a provision called a Hardship Discharge that provides relief for debtors who can’t continue with a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The hardship discharge is contained for in 11 U.S.C. 1328(b). The debtor who cannot complete the repayment plan, can ask the court for a hardship discharge. In most cases, the discharge is only available when the following conditions are met:

Through no fault of his own, debtor has experienced circumstances that are beyond his control that makes it impossible for him to continue to make plan payments.
The payments made so far in the Chapter 13 Plan are at least as much as each creditor would have received in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation case, i.e., the “best interest” test is satisfied.
The repayment plan can’t be modified to allow debtor to continue making payments at a lower amount.

When it is expected that the period of hardship is short, the bankruptcy courts prefer that debtor moves to modify his Chapter 13 Plan to pay a lower amount than was originally agreed upon until circumstances change for the better. Given the present economic difficulties, bankruptcy courts, here in Rochester and elsewhere in New York, are willing to consider a hardship discharge as a way to move the case forward rather than risking dismissal or conversion to Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

If debtor cannot continue to work as a result of an illness or injury, it is likely that his income was reduced significantly or he may not be able to work at all. In some cases, debtor might not have any money left over once his basic living expenses are met. In this case, a hardship discharge may be the answer. It will eliminate any debts that are dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Upcoming Changes to the Means Test

alexkorotkin — Sun, 13 Mar 2011 04:04:14 +0000

Once again, the means test figures for median income are changing as of March 15, 2011. In New York, it means that the amount of income that the debtor can have before being forced into a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is going to increase.

Through March14, 2011, a single debtor in New York could have $45,548 in income in income and still be able to file Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Starting March 15, 2011, that figure is increasing to $46,295. Similar increases will take place for all family sizes. The comparison of the existing and new income limits is below.

Old Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$45,548 $56,845 $67,292 $82,587

New Income Limits

FAMILY SIZE

1 EARNER 2 PEOPLE 3 PEOPLE 4 PEOPLE *

$46,295 $57,777 $68,396 $83,942

* Add $7,500 for each individual in excess of 4.

While the increases are not large, they are an improvement on the last set of income limits. The reason for a slight growth in the median income is the decline in the American economy. Since the economy is down, employers do not give employees significant wages increases. As a result, the American median family income has grown only slightly, and means test figures increased only moderately.